In an appeal against an order directing deposit of Rs.12 lakh, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay held that no merit existed in the appeal, dismissed it, extended the time for deposit by four weeks, and disposed of the accompanying notice of motion.
Appeal dismissed; time to deposit extended by four weeks; notice of motion disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
mst
APP.1031.10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO.1031 OF 2010
IN
SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.147 OF 2009
IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO.510 OF 2009 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2915 OF 2010
ALONG WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO._______ OF 2010 IN
APPEAL NO.1031 OF 2010 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.147 OF 2009 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.510 OF 2009
Prakash Gandhi and another
Appellants
versus
Vikas Motwani Respondent
Mr.Ruchir Tolat i/by L.C.Tolat & Co. for appellants. Mr.Omprakash Pandey for respondent.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. AND DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATE : 20th October 2010
P. C. :
APP.1031.10
2
mst
Judgment directing the appellants to deposit a sum of Rs.12.00 lakh within a period of eight weeks, as against the plaintiff's claim of Rs.21.00 lakh with interest @ 12% p.a..
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against the order directing deposit of sum should be allowed.
Prakash Gandhi
Vikas Motwani
MOHIT S. SHAH
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
