COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT…
The contempt petition was dismissed as it did not survive due to a compromise between the parties in the underlying suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD.
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 88 OF 2008
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders |
CORAM : P. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 20th JULY, 2010.
1 Adv. Shri S.S. Kulkarni is present for the contempt petitioner. Adv. Miss Vaishnav is present for respondent nos. 1 and 2.
2 Parties place on record compromise arrived at between the parties in Special Civil Suit no. 15/2002 dt.17-4-2010 and also consequent order regarding disposal of the suit. Said documents are taken on record and marked as ‘X’ and ‘Y’ respectively. This contempt petition therefore does not survive and same is disposed of.
( P. R. BORKAR, J.)
dyb / office /cp88.08.odt
P. R. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
