A single judge allowed a condonation of delay application filed for a First Appeal involving a 16-day lapse, allowing the appeal to proceed with an interim stay.
Leave to file First Appeal granted; interim stay order continued pending further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CA NO.2203/2010 in FA ST.NO.2905/2010.
Office notes, office Memoranda of
Coram,appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
CORAM: P.R.BORKAR, J.
DATE : 19th July, 2010.
1) Heard Shri BK Pawar, Adv. h/for Mr. AB
Kale; Shri SS Patil, Adv. for Resp.Nos.
1 & 2 present; Shri US Malte, Adv.
appears for Respondent No.3.
2) This is an application for condonation
of delay of 16 days, caused in filing
the present appeal.
3) For the reasons stated in the
application, delay is condoned. CA for
condonation of delay is allowed.
4) Office to register First Appeal.
5) Interim stay to continue till further
orders.
(P.R.BORKAR)
JUDGE
bdv/ca2203.10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 16 days in filing the first appeal is condonable.
Mr. AB Kale
Respondent No. 1
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
P.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court