Contempt petition disposed of as infructuous after parties entered into consent terms and authorities redressed grievances.
Contempt petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cp 67.09.doc22
srk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 67 OF 2009
| Smt. Surekha S. Joshi | ... Petitioner |
|---|---|
| Vs. | |
| Mr. Narendra Jadhav & Anr. | ... Respondents |
Mr. S.R.Vakil i/b R.A.Thorat for Petitioner.
Mr. G.S.Kulkarni i/b Mrs. M.G.Kulkarni for Respondent nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 9th September, 2010.
P. C.
The learned counsel for the parties make a statement that the parties have entered into consent terms on 23rd August, 2010 and the authorities have tried to redress the grievances of the Petitioner as per the Consent Terms. Copy of the Consent Terms is marked 'X' for identification. Therefore, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
Smt. Surekha S. Joshi
Mr. Narendra Jadhav
J.H. BHATIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
