Hon'ble Court held that since the respondent tendered a compliance report showing payment of recovery cheque by J.D., nothing survives in the petitioner's contempt petition. Contempt petition disposed of and rule discharged.
Contempt petition disposed of; Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 55 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2522 OF 2009
Manish Ramesh Taori
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Others.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Orders
Court's or Judge's
directions and Registrar's orders.
Ms. A. P. Shinde Adv for petitioner. Mr. D. T. Shinde Adv for respondents 3. Mr. N. S. Khubalkar AGP for reswpondents 1 & 2.
CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL J.
DATED: 17th AUGUST, 2010.
Heard. Learned counsel for the
respondent no.4 states, he has tendered compliance report which indeed illustrate that recovery certificate is adhered to, in receipt thereto the J. D. has paid three cheques covering the amount of recovery certificate total Rs. 6,48,016/- (Rupees Six Lac Forty
Eight Thousand Sixteen only). The cheques are
2
tendered before the learned Registrar District Consumer Forum Nagpur. In the light of such compliance nothing survives. Contempt petition disposed of. Rule discharged.
JUDGE
svk
Manish Ramesh Taori
State of Maharashtra
Others
K. U. Chandiwai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
