The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of a chamber summons as infructuous after the petitioner sought to implead the applicant, who had no objection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MMJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.58 OF 2010
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.15 OF 2010
M/s. Sai Aastha Developers ..Petitioner vs.
Chief Officer, Maharashtr Housing & Area Development & Ors. ..Respondents And M/s. Ruchi Priya Developers Pvt Ltd. ..Applicant
Mr. G.S. Godbole i/b Mr. O. P. Singh for the Petitioner
Ms I.K. Calcuttawala AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 3
Mr. D. A. Nalawade GP for Respondent No.2
Mr. S.G. Surana i/b Mr. C.N. Gole for the Applicant
CORAM : J. N. PATEL & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ.
DATE : 13th APRIL, 2010
P.C. :
In view of the fact that the petitioners themselves have sought to implead the applicant as party respondent. The chamber summons does not survive and is disposed of as infractuous.
The Applicant states that they have no objection to join as party
respondent, as sought for by the Petitioner in chamber summons No.104 of
( J. N. PATEL, J.)
( A.P. BHANGALE, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the chamber summons survives when the petitioner seeks to implead the applicant as a party respondent.
Whether the applicant has any objection to be joined as a party respondent.
M/s. Sai Aastha Developers
M/s. Ruchi Priya Developers Pvt Ltd.
Chief Officer, Maharashtr Housing & Area Development
J. N. PATEL
A.P. BHANGALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
