The High Court of Judicature at Bombay restored a writ petition (WP No. 2 of 2010) to file for defaultdismissal after finding that no notice was issued to the respondents. The associated civil application was subsequently disposed of.
Civil application disposed of; Writ Petition restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16-AS-CAW2392.10
AJN
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2392 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2 OF 2010
Vijaysingh Madhavrao Patwardhan ... Applicant
Vs.
Sangli Miraj & Kupwad City Municipal Corporation, Sangli through its Commissioner, & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. A.M. Kulkarni for the applicant.
Ms. Jyoti Pawar, A.G.P. for respondents 2 to 4.
CORAM: MRS. RANJANA DESAI & R.V. MORE, JJ.
DATED : 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2010.
P.C.:-
16-AS-CAW2392.10
AJN
2
learned A.G.P. for respondents 2, 3 and 4. For the reasons
stated in the civil application, writ petition is restored to file.
[MRS. RANJANA DESAI, J.]
[R.V. MORE, J.]
Vijaysingh Madhavrao Patwardhan
Sangli Miraj & Kupwad City Municipal Corporation
Ranjana Desai
R.V. More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
