The Court condoned a delay of 228 days in filing the Letters Patent Appeal, finding sufficient cause was shown, and made the rule absolute.
Delay of 228 days condoned; Rule made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAL.161/2010
1
acd
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 161 OF 2010 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL(ST) NO.12050 OF 2010 IN CAF NO. 2556 OF 2009
Nandkishor Narayan Joshi & Ors.
...Applicants.
Vs.
Sujeet Narendra Sharma & Ors..
...Respondents.
Mr. L.C. Chaugule, i/b O.P. Pandya, for the Applicants. Mr. Y.R. Mishra i/b D.A. Athawale, for Respondents.
CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE : 13th JULY, 2010.
P.C.
1] Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we find that sufficient cause is shown for condoning delay of 228 days in filing the Letters Patent Appeal and hence, delay is condoned. Rule made absolute.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
2 CAL.161/2010
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is shown for condoning a delay of 228 days in filing the Letters Patent Appeal?
MOHIT S. SHAH
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
