The Bombay High Court condoned a 95-day delay in filing a letters patent appeal. Upon acknowledgment of sufficient cause, the rule was made absolute and the appeal listed for admission.
Delay condoned and rule made absolute; application disposed of for listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAL.126/2010
1
acd
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 126 OF 2010 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL(ST) NO.9502 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7587 OF 2009
Central Bank of India ....Applicant. Vs. The General Secretary, Central Bank Employees Association & Anr. ...Respondents. .....
None for the Petitioner.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE : 13th JULY, 2010.
P.C.
1] Though served, none appears on behalf of respondents. Sufficient cause is shown for 95 days’ delay in filing appeal.
2] Delay is condoned. Rule made absolute. Application stands disposed of.
Appeal be listed for admission on 20th July, 2010.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
2 CAL.126/2010
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the 95-day delay in filing the appeal.
Central Bank of India
The General Secretary, Central Bank Employees Association
Mohit S. Shah
S.C. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
