It was held that the Application for transposing Applicant Nos. 2A and 2B (L.Rs.) to Appellant Nos. is allowed. Amendment was directed within two weeks, followed by disposal of the Application.
Application allowed; Applicants 2A & 2B transposed as Appellants; Amendment within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CA-728-10.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Mhi
CVIL APPLICATION NO.728 OF 2010 in
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 699 OF 2008
Vasant Nagu Chavan (Vadar) & Ors. Vs.
Atmaram Hanumant Chavan ... Respondent
Mr. Abhishek Kandarkar i/b. S.G.Deshmukh,Advocates, for the applicants Mr. M.R.Kotikar,Advocate for the respondent No.1.
CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 13th September, 2010.
P.C.
present applicants, who are the L.Rs. of original plaintiff No.1, were not available
at the time of filing of the appeal and therefore they were shown as respondent
Nos. 2A and 2B. As their interest with the plaintiff No.2 is common, they seek to
bet transposed as appellant Nos. 2A and 2B.
The applicants Nos. 2A & 2B be transposed as appellants in the Appeal. Amendment be effected within two weeks.
CA-728-10.sxw
2
Application stands disposed of.
(J.H.BHATIA,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Applicant Nos. 2A and 2B be allowed to be transposed as Appellant Nos. 2A and 2B.
Vasant Nagu Chavan (Vadar) & Ors.
Atmaram Hanumant Chavan
J.H.Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
