The Bombay High Court allowed a company application for setting aside an order dismissing a company petition for non-prosecution, directing the respondent to file an affidavit-in-reply.
Company application allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) of the affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
jmi
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 184 OF 2010
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO. 217 OF 2009.
M/s. Klirak Sh. P.K. ..Applicant.
Org. Petitioner.
v/s.
M/s. AVI Shipping Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent/ Org.Respondent.
Ms. Usha Srivastava, i/b. M/s. Consulta Juris, for Applicant. Mr. Krunal Sampat, i/b. Sidharth Murarka, for Respondent.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 27TH AUGUST 2010.
P.C.
The Company Application is taken out for setting aside of theorder dated 11th June 2009 dismissing the Company Petition for non-prosecution.
M/s. Klirak Sh. P.K.
M/s. AVI Shipping Pvt. Ltd.
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
