A company petition was disposed of on consent terms signed by the parties. The undertakings contained in the terms were accepted by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
jpc/-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 148 OF 2010
Mr. Madan Mohan Gupta Versus
.. Petitioner
M/s Blue Sky Brandcomm Asia Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr. G. B. Kedia for the petitioner
Mr. Cyrus Ardeshir i/by M/s Kanga & Co. for the Respondent
CORAM : S. J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 26th August, 2010
P.C.:
1. The learned Advocates appearing for the parties have tendered Consent Terms dated 26th August, 2010. They have submitted that the Company Petition be disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are signed by the parties and their respective Advocates.
2. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked- 'X' for identification.
3. The undertaking given in clause No.4 of he Consent Terms is accepted.
4. The Company Petition is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms marked 'X'.
(S. J. KATHAWALLA, J.)
Mr. Madan Mohan Gupta
M/s Blue Sky Brandcomm Asia Pvt. Ltd.
S. J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
