Allowed
Janta Vyapari So and Ors. v. Gumanchand Kanhayyalal Mutha
Bombay HCCA/1246/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1246 OF 2009
IN
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 54 OF 2007
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders |
CORAM : P. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 21st JULY, 2010.
1 Heard Adv. Shri S.S. Kazi for the applicant and Adv. Shri Amol Gandhi for respondent.
2 In view of sale-deeds produced with the application and the order dt. 25-7-2007 passed by this court, this application is allowed. The purchasers are allowed to be added as party respondents to the Civil Revision Application. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ Amendment to be carried out at the earliest. After
2
amendment is carried out, issue notice to the added respondents.
( P. R. BORKAR, J.)
dyb / office /ca1246.09.odt
applicant
respondent
P. R. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court