Sushil Sudhakar Neherkar v. the Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders.
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
CA/12358/2010 SUSHIL V/S UOI
- Heard Shri M.R.Andhale, learned Advocate for the applicant and Shri V.B.Ghatge, learned AGP for respondent No.3.
- For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). The applicant is permitted to remove the office objections within one week from today. No order as to costs.
(SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) Dt.8.10.2010 akl
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court