anil sekhri v. s. s. kantilal ishwarlal securities Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
ssm IN THE HIGH COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
arbp392.07.sxw
1
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 392 OF 2007
Anil Sekhri ....Petitioner. Vs. S.S. Kantilal Ishwarlal Securities Pvt. Ltd. ....Respondent.
Mr. Karan Advani i/by M/s. Advani & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Mahendra Rathod i/by Mr. Rajesh Desai for the Respondent.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 6th December, 2010.
P.C.:
Inspite of repeated communication, the Petitioner is not
responding to the learned Advocate/ Counsel since April, 2009. It appears that the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. The Petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to apply.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Anil Sekhri
S.S. Kantilal Ishwarlal Securities Pvt. Ltd.
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court