In this criminal revision matter, the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court restored the principal revision petition due to good and sufficient reasons existing as stated in the application.
Criminal Revision No. 20/07 stands restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 39 of 2010 (In Cri. Revi. No. 20 of 2007)
Tulshiram S/o Natthuji Lekurwale & anr. ...Versus... The St. of Mah.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's order
Shri S.L. Kotwal Adv. for the applicants.
CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 15.02.2010
Heard.
For the reasons stated in the application, I am
satisfied that good and sufficient reasons exist to restore the matter. Hence, this application is allowed. Cri. Revi. No. 20/07 stands restored.
JUDGE
/TA/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Revision application should be allowed to restore the main matter based on sufficient reasons stated in it.
Tulshiram S/o Natthuji Lekurwale & anr.
The St. of Mah.
A.B. CHAUDHARI
J.
DATED :- 15.02.2010
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
