The court condoned a one-month delay in filing a maintenance application. The applicant undertook to pay Rs.15,000 in three installments within one month, and the matter was restored for final hearing with earlier interim orders continued.
Delay condoned; matter restored for final hearing; interim orders continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 23of 2010 (In Cri. Appln. 22/10 in Cri. Revi. No. 286 of 2005)
Ramratan s/o Pandurangji Sunawani ...Versus... Smt. Maya w/o Ramratan Sunwani & anr.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's order
Shri Junaid Ahmed Adv. for the applicant.
CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 15.02.2010
Counsel for the applicant upon taking instructions
from his client makes a statement that within one month the amount of Rs.15,000/- towards maintenance shall be paid to the respondents in three instalments. Statement accepted.
In view of above statement, delay is condoned and matter is restored to file for final hearing.
Counsel for the applicant undertakes to inform the respondents about restoration of the revision and also place acknowledgment on record to that effect.
Interim orders made earlier to continue.
JUDGE
/TA/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the application should be condoned given the applicant's undertaking to pay maintenance.
Ramratan s/o Pandurangji Sunawani
Smt. Maya w/o Ramratan Sunwani
anr.
A.B. CHAUDHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
