The court heard an anticipatory bail application but did not grant it. The applicant instead requested leave to withdraw the anticipation application to pursue regular bail, ensuring surrender within a week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.967 OF 2010
Mr.Shaukat Ramzan Nadaf...Applicant.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra...Respondent.
Mr. V.V.Purwant for the Applicant.
Mrs. M.H.Mhatre, APP. for the State.
CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J.
DATE : 19th March, 2010
PC :
1I have heard the Advocate for the applicant
at length. I am not inclined to grant anticipatory
bail. However, at the stage of passing of the
order, the Advocate for the applicant states that
his client would like to surrender and apply for
regular bail. He therefore, seeks leave to withdraw
the application. Application is therefore,
dismissed as withdrawn. Advocate for the applicant
states that the applicant will surrender within one
week from today. The applicant may not be arrested
for a period of one week from today.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be granted or if it is to be treated as withdrawn in favor of regular bail.
Mr.Shaukat Ramzan Nadaf
The State of Maharashtra
R.S. MOHITE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court