Ramrudavan Mishra v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPLN/566/2010
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court rejected an application for anticipatory bail. The court held that missing articles from the allegedly illegally occupied flat necessitated their tracing for the police, making it not a fit case for anticipatory bail. The application was disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Application for anticipatory bail rejected and disposed of.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶3
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.566 OF 2010
¶4
Mr. Ramrudavan Mishra...Applicant.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra...Respondent.
¶5
Mr.Karun Bhosale along with Mr. Abhijit Salve i/by
Wasim Ansari for the Applicant.
¶6
Mrs.A.A.Mane, APP for State.
¶7
Mr. Nitin Pradhan i/by Smt. S.D.Khot for the
original complainant.
¶8
CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J.
DATE : 17th March, 2010
¶9
PC :
¶10
1Heard all parties.
¶11
2This is an application for grant of
¶12
anticipatory bail. The alleged offence is under
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the present case is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail.
Whether lack of documentary evidence regarding possession makes this a fit case for anticipatory bail.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Ramrudavan Mishra
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
AI extract
R.S. MOHITE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court