One judge polled the bench on an appeal where delay in filing was condoned. The application was admitted and disposed of without substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRI. APPA NO. 511 OF 2010 IN
CRI. APPLN. NO. OF 2010.
(RAMU DASHRATH BANTE.....VS... STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PSO HINGNA & OTH.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. N.A.Badar, Advocate for Applicant.
CORAM : A.P.LAVANDE & P.D.KODE, JJ . DATED : JULY 22, 2010.
Heard Mr. Badar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mrs. Wandile, learned A.P.P. for the respondent.
Since the appellant is in jail delay of 299 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of accordingly.
CRI. APPEAL NO. OF 2010 .
Heard.
ADMIT
Call R & P.
Mrs. Wandile, learned A.P.P. waives notice on behalf of the respondent.
JUDGE JUDGE
RR.
Ramu Dashrath Bante
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Hingna
A. Lavande
P.D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
