The High Court dismissed the appeal against an interlocutory order, clarifying that the appellant can raise all contentions before the trial judge.
Appeal dismissed; appellant permitted to raise contentions before Trial Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
623.2010
1
mst
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (L) NO.623 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.63 OF 2010 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.28 OF 2004 IN
TESTAM ENTARY PETITION NO.115 OF 2001
Damayanti Dilip Sampat and others Appellants Versus
Vrajeshkumar Pravinkumar Sampat and another Respondents
Miss Vaishali Choudhari for appellants.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. AND DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
13th September 2010
P. C. :
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to entertain an appeal against an interlocutory order of the trial judge.
Damayanti Dilip Sampat and others
Vrajeshkumar Pravinkumar Sampat and another
MOHIT S. SHAH
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
