The High Court at Bombay disposed of Suit No. 114 of 1980 and related chamber summons because the parties had settled the dispute and filed Minutes of Order, taking such minutes on record and passing an order accordingly.
Suit and chamber summons disposed of in terms of Minutes of Order filed by parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.114 OF 1980
ALONGWITH
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1629 OF 2007
ALONGWITH
CHAMBER SUMMON NO.1854 OF 2007
Mrs. Sushilabai N. Runghta ...Plaintiff
V/s
Radheshyam Chiranjilal Goenka and others
... Defendants.
Mr. M.L. Chaturvedi for plaintiff and defendant Nos. 11 and 12.
Mr. Prasad Das for defendant Nos. 2, 5, 6 and 9.
Mr. Yatin R. Shah for defendant Nos. 4, 7 and 8.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE, J.
DATE : 20TH JANUARY, 2010
P.C.:-
2
respective advocates of the parties is taken on record and marked “X” for the purpose of identification.
Radheshyam Chiranjilal Goenka
V. M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
