The single-judge bench, though hearing only the petitioner, recalled an order dismissing a contempt petition for want of prosecution and restored the petition to the file upon the petitioner's explanation.
Order dated 4.1.2010 recalled; Contempt Petition No. 73 of 2008 restored for admission on 25.1.2010.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 112 OF 2010
IN
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 73 OF 2008
IN
SUIT NO. 2530 OF 1999
Mr.Ravindra Bhupendra Tank...Petitioner/
Orig.Defendant No.6.
vs.
M/s.Vinit Nirman & Ors....Contemners/
Orig.Defendant Nos.2,3
and 4.
Mr.R.D. Dave i/b. Mr.R.M. Shah for the Petitioner.
CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J.
DATED : JANUARY 19, 2010
P.C. :-
1Heard Counsel for the petitioner. None
appears on behalf of the respondents. The
petitioner has filed affidavit of service dated 12th
January, 2010. The petitioner is seeking restoration
of the contempt petition which was dismissed for
want of prosecution by Order dated 4th January, 2010.
2
2For reasons stated in the affidavit in
support of the Notice of Motion, explanation offered
by the petitioner for not remaining present when the
contempt petition was called for hearing is
accepted. Order dated 4th January, 2010 is recalled.
Contempt Petition is restored to the file.
admission board on next Monday, 25th January, 2010.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to recall the order dismissing the contempt petition for want of prosecution and restore the matter to the file.
Ravindra Bhupendra Tank
M/s. Vinit Nirman & Ors.
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court