This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.834 OF 2008
Shaikh Fakir Mohd. .. Petitioner
vs.
B.M.C. & Ors. .. Respondents
Ms.S.M.Mondle for the respondents
CORAM: J.N. PATEL, &
Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATE: 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009
P.C.
1. None for the petitioner.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the M.C.G.M.
states that the matter would be disposed of on the last
date. Whatever it may be, as the matter is listed
today, we dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.
(J.N. Patel, J.)
2
(Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.)
Shaikh Fakir Mohd.
B.M.C.
J.N. PATEL
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court