Rajesh Mangal v. Special Recovery and Sales Officer and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was rejected as the period specified in the circular dated 28.11.2007 had already elapsed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8286 OF 2009
Rajesh Mangal ... Petitioner Vs. Special Recovery & Sales Officers & Ors. Respondents
Mr. M.P.Mishra i/b. M/s. M.P.Mishra & Co., Advocates for the petitioner.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ.
DATE : 10th December, 2009.
P.C.
The only grievance of the petitioner is that considering the circular petitioner agreed to pay further amount by the next year. The circular is dated 28.11.2007. We are in December,2009. The period is already over. In the light of that no interference is called for. The petition is rejected.
(J.H.BHATIA,J.)
(F.I.REBELLO,J.)
Rajesh Mangal
Special Recovery & Sales Officers
F. I. Rebello
J. H. Bhathia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court