Dismissed
Bapurao Narhari Sontakke v. the State of Mah
Bombay HCWP/822/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
DISTRICT:
OfficeMemorandaappearanceorders orRegistrar’ |
Notes,ofs,directis orders |
OfficeCoram,Court’sons and. |
Court’s or Judge’s order |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cr |
iminal |
Writ petition No. 822 Of 2009----- |
|||
Mr.Pro |
K.B.secutor |
Choudhari, Additional Publicfor Respondent /State. |
|||
----- |
|||||
1) |
Heard |
. |
|||
2) |
learn |
ed Additional Public Prosecutor |
|||
sub |
mits o |
n instructions that amount of |
|||
Rs. |
3,000 |
/- (Rs. Three thousand only) |
|||
dep |
osited |
in the account of the convict |
|||
is |
withdra |
wn by the wife of convict. |
|||
3) |
Matt |
er is disposed of accordingly. |
|||
(SH |
RIHARI |
P DAVARE,J)(NARESH H PATIL,J.) |
|||
Datsdm/ |
ed :- 1822.09 |
4thSeptember, 2009. |
Shrihari P Davare
Naresh H Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court