Rajendra Jonko v. the Union of India and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's Writ Petition was allowed to be withdrawn with costs left open and all grounds kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 803 OF 2009
Rajendra Jonko ).. Petitioner
Versus
The Unon of India and others ).. Respondents
Mrs. Jyoti Chavan for the Petitioner. Mrs. S.I. Shah for the Respondents.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 29TH AUGUST 2009
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner wishes to withdraw the Writ Petition. Writ Petition allowed to be withdrawn and
disposed of as such. No order as to costs. All grounds kept open.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Rajendra Jonko
The Union of India
Swatanter Kumar
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court