Writ petition filed by Gangubai N. Suram against Madhukar Shankar Kumar was dismissed as the respondent Corporation accepted notice and agreed to treat the matter as a representation for examination.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1355 OF 2009
Gangubai N. Suram ).. Petitioner Versus Madhukar Shankar Kumar and others ).. Respondents
Mrs. B.P. Jakhade for the Petitioner. Ms. S. Ajithkumar for the Mumbai Municipal Corporation.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 29TH AUGUST 2009
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation accepts notice and submits that they will treat the present Writ Petition as a representation to the Competent Authority of the Corporation and shall examine the matter in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders expeditiously.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Gangubai N. Suram
Madhukar Shankar Kumar
SWATANTR KUMAR
A.M. KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
