The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of Writ Petition No. 785 of 2009, finding that no substantive issue survived after the Corporation assured it would examine the petition's averments.
Writ Petition disposed of; Corporation directed to act expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 785 OF 2009
Chandrakant Digambar Karkhanis ).. Petitioner Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ) and another ).. Respondents
Mr. D.K. Ghaisas for the Petitioner. Mrs. V.S. Gharapure for Respondent No.1 Corporation. Mr. B.S. Nayak for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 22ND SEPTEMBER 2009
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 Corporation submits that they will examine the averments made in the Writ Petition and after hearing the Petitioner and Respondent No.2 will take action in accordance with law. In fact, she points out that the Corporation has already started taking appropriate action and now the matter will be dealt with expeditiously.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Chandrakant Digambar Karkhanis
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Swatanter Kumar
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
