The High Court dismissed a review petition as withdrawn since the petitioner had no interest in pursuing the remedy following the dismissal of the corresponding Supreme Court appeal on 7/9/2009.
Review petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO. 115 of 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 437 of 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 811 of 2006
Shri Satish Bhatnagar & ors. v/s. Vinod Rajkumar Bhatnagar & ors.
...Petitioners
...Respondents
Ms. Usha Dharakkar i/b. M/s. Divya Shah Assocaites for the petitioners. Ms. Shilpa Mangle for respondents 12 & 13.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
DATED:- September 18, 2009.
P.C.
Counsel appearing for the Petitioner on instructions state that petitioner is
not interested in pursuing this remedy as against the order under review the
petitioner had carried the matter in appeal before the Supreme Court which has
been dismissed on 7/9/2009. In the circumstances, this review petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)
Shri Satish Bhatnagar & ors.
Vinod Rajkumar Bhatnagar & ors.
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
