In a criminal writ petition regarding encroachment debris, the court accepted municipal counsel's statement that debris was cleared. The petition was disposed of as infructuous.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
srk
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET APPELLATE SIDE
Criminal Writ Petition No.779 of 2009
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr.R.N.Kachawe for petitioner. Mr.D.P.Adsule, APP for State. Mr.Sandeep Patil for resp.no.2-MMC.
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE &. R.Y.GANOO,JJ. November 17, 2009.
P.C.
The learned counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation states that the debris of the encroachment have been cleared and, therefore, nothing further survives in this petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the debris have been cleared.
Hence the petition is disposed as infructuous.
(R.Y.GANOO,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
Petitioner
State
No.2-MMC
B.H. Marlappalle
R.Y. Ganoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
