The State appealed an acquittal order, seeking transfer of the appeal to Sessions Court due to unserved respondent.
directed to transfer appeal to Sessions Court at Kolhapur
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
USJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2001
The State of Maharashtra .. Appellant
v/s.
Mangesh Madhukar Bhingarde .. Respondent
Smt. V.R. Bhosale, APP for Applicant State. None for respondent .
CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & R.Y.GANOO, JJ.
Dated : 16th November, 2009.
P.C. :
01.2.2005 and for the last more than 8 years, the accused respondent could not be served.
: 2 :
efficacious for the learned Sessions / Addl. Sessions Judge to ensure that the respondent is served through the concerned police station.
appeal to the Sessions Court at Kolhapur.
[R.Y.GANOO, J.] [B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.]
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State of Maharashtra
Mangesh Madhukar Bhingarde
B.H. MARLAPALLE
R.Y.GANOO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
