Allowed

Ashok Chintaman Inamdar v. the Deccan Education Society and Ors.

Bombay HC26 Nov 2009WP/7379/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Bench of the Bombay High Court, following a prior decision and a Supreme Court order, made the petitioner's rule absolute. The respondents were directed to calculate leave encashment for 180 days or the actual duration within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondents 1 and 2 directed to calculate leave and pay encashment for max 180 days within eight weeks in the first instance.

Ashok Chintaman Inamdar Vs the Deccan… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2009)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 7379 OF 2009

¶4

Dr. Ashok Chintaman Inamdar	...	Petitioner
Vs.
The Deccan Education Society & Ors.	...	Respondents

¶5

Mr. K.J.Kandpile, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.D.Borwankar, Advcate for respndent No.1. Mr. V.S.Masurkar, Government Pleader for respondent No.3.

¶6

CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ.

¶7

DATE : 26^th November, 2009.

¶8

P.C.

¶9

Rule. Heard forthwith.

¶10

In our opinion, the issue is squarely covered by the Judgment of this Court dated 22.1.2009 in V.R. Agarkar vs. The Chairman, Grievance Cell Committee, Pune University and others in W.P. No.4936 of 2006. That Judgment was thereafter followed in W.P. No. 2309 of 2007 decided on 30.4.2007. S.L.P. was preferred in respect of an order passed in W.P. No.2309 of 2007. The learned Supreme Court was pleased to dismiss the Special Leave Petition.

¶11

¶12

For the reasons set out therein, we pass the following order :-

¶13

In the light of that the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 based on the leave

¶14

record of the petitioner to calculate the leave of the petitioner to which he is entitled to and to pay him leave encashment for the maximum 180 days or lesser to the extent that the petitioner is entitled to. The entire exercise is to be completed within eight weeks from today. The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to pay the amount in the first instance and if they are entitled to be reimbursed by way of grant from respondent No.3, then to apply to respondent No.3 for the same. Rule is made absolute in the above terms. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶15

(J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)

Ashok Chintaman Inamdar v. the Deccan Education Society and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Chintaman Inamdar v. the Deccan Education Society and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gyanodaya Shikshan Pracharak Samiti'S Rtp English Primary School, Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sammy D. Kataria Vs Sanjeev M. Khangiani and Ors.

Amar Vijaysinh Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Vidya Chand Vs the Deccan Education Society and Ors.

Lalita S. Honap Vs the Deccan Education Society and Ors.

Bharat Bhalchandra Deogadkar Vs the Deccan Education Society and Ors.