Petition transferred back after respondent communicated transfer order reversal and petitioner's charge at Mumbai.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
WRIT PETITION (LODG.) NO.2183 OF 2008
Vijay Kumar Anand Lokhande Vs.
Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (MHADA) and others
..Petitioner.
..Respondents.
Mr. C.J. Joveson i/b Mr. K.P. Anilkumar for the Petitioner. Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleader for the State.
CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. &
RAJESH G. KETKAR, J .rd April, 2009.
P.C. :
The Learned Government Pleader has placed on the record a copy of the communication dated 1st April, 2009 by which the Petitioner has been transferred back from Amravati to Mumbai to the post which he held prior to the order of transfer. Learned Government Pleader states that the Petitioner has also taken charge of the post in the meantime at Mumbai. In view of the statement which has been
made on behalf of the Respondents, nothing further survives in the Petition which is accordingly disposed of.
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
RAJESH G. KETKAR, J.
Vijay Kumar Anand Lokhande
Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (MHADA)
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
RAJESH G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
