The High Court at Bombay took a notice in a writ petition. The respondent undertook to pass an order of adjudication within one month. Consequently, the rule was made absolute. No substantive decision on the merits is recorded in this order.
The rule was made absolute after the respondent undertook to pass the order of adjudication within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mgn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6241 OF 2009
Gurinder Singh Prop. Of G.S. Enterprises...Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India
...Respondents
Ms.A.M. Patne i/b. ACE Legal Consultants for the petitioner. Mr. Rohit Pardeshi, for the Respondents.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.G.KARNIK, JJ.
DATED : 21ST JULY, 2009
P.C.
Notice waived on behalf of the respondents. Rule. Heard forthwith. On behalf of the Respondents learned Counsel makes a statement that if the order of adjudication has not been passed, the same will be passed not later than one month from today. Statement accepted. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs.
(D.G. KARNIK, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Gurinder Singh Prop. Of G.S. Enterprises
Union of India
F.I. REBELLO
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
