Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Atul Bhaurao Khulge Vs the Union of India and Ors. — Bombay HC (2009) — LawSathi Research

Home
Bombay HC
2009
Atul Bhaurao Khulge Vs the Union of India and Ors.Atul Bhaurao Khulge v. the Union of India and Ors.

Allowed

Atul Bhaurao Khulge v. the Union of India and Ors.

Bombay HC22 Jul 2009WP/1513/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition challenging a service tax order, the High Court held that the impugned order violated principles of natural justice due to the lack of a show cause notice and procedural violation under relevant rules, setting aside the order and remanding the matter.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order dated 24th March 2008 set aside. The matter remanded to the respondent for issuing a show cause notice and passing an appropriate order.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

The impugned order dated 24th March 2008 set aside. The matter remanded to the respondent for issuing a show cause notice and passing an appropriate order.

Issue for consideration

Whether an order directing the determination of taxable service value and discharge of service tax suffered from violation of natural justice in the absence of a show cause notice? +1 more

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

An order implicating the discharge of service tax under the Finance Act, 1994 without a preliminary show cause notice is vitiated by violation of the principles of natural justice and fair play. Such orders suffer from procedural irregularity under the Rules framed under the Act. The proper implication is that the aggrieved party be given an opportunity of being heard before an order imposing liability is passed.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

1

abs

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO.1513 OF 2009

Atul Bhaurao Khulge .. Petitioner V/s

The Union of India & Ors.

.. Respondents

Mr. Makrand Joshi for the Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Rao for the respondents.

CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.G. KARNIK, JJ.

DATE : 22ND JULY 2009

P.C. :

Rule. Heard forthwith.

The petition is against the order dated 24^th March 2008 whereby the petitioner was directed to determine the correct value of the taxable service and to discharge the amount of service tax along with the amount of interest at the appropriate rates provided under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 and the Rules framed thereunder, and to file prescribed periodical returns on the basis of the compliance.

The grievance of the petitioner is that before this order was passed, no show cause notice was issued to him.

2

On the last occasion, the matter was adjourned in order to enable the respondents to take instructions. At today’s hearing, on behalf of the respondents, learned counsel on instructions states that he has been informed that there is no record available in the office to show the service of notice on the petitioner.

Considering the above, in our opinion, the order suffers from violation of the principles of natural justice and fair play apart from violation of the provisions of the Rules.

In the light of the above, the impugned order dated 24^th March 2008 is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the respondent no.3 for issuing show cause notice to the petitioner and thereafter to pass appropriate order according to law.

Learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner on instructions states that the address of the petitioner is the address as shown in the petition. Statement is accepted.

Rule is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs.

(D.G. KARNIK, J.)

Issues for consideration

2 issues framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether an order directing the determination of taxable service value and discharge of service tax suffered from violation of natural justice in the absence of a show cause notice?
2.
Principles of natural justice and fair play applicable to service tax proceedings

Statutes considered

2 provisions across 2 enactments

AI extract

Finance Act, 1994Finance Act, 1994
Rules framed thereunderRules framed thereunder

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Atul Bhaurao Khulge
respondent
The Union of India

Coram

AI extract

F.I. REBELLO
D.G. KARNIK

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 22 Jul 2009 · July
Registered: 19 Jan 2009
Case no.: WP/1513/2009
CNR: HCBM010019642009
Bench: D.g. Karnik F.i. Rebello
Disposal: Rule Made Absolute

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from D.g. Karnik F.i. Rebello

M/S. R.Dalpatlal and Co. Vs State Trading Corpn. and Ors.
21 Jul 2009
Gurinder Singh Vs Union of India and Anr.
16 Jul 2009
M.K.Tikone Vs the Union of India and Ors.
22 Jul 2009
M/S Uni Gems (I)Ltd. and Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors.
22 Jul 2009
M/S. Sona Processors (India) Ltd. Vs Textile Committee, Government of India and 3 Ors.
22 Jul 2009

Cite this judgement

Atul Bhaurao Khulge v. the Union of India and Ors., WP/1513/2009 (BOM), decided on 22 July 2009.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes2

Finance Act, 1994Finance Act, 1994
Rules framed thereunderRules framed thereunder

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

F.I. REBELLO and D.G. KARNIK

Parties & counsel