Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition. The court granted leave to withdraw, noting that proceedings were pending before the Collector, and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.578 OF 2009
Deepak S/o Ramkrishna Bharuka. ... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
& Others. ... Respondents.
Shri. P.K. Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Shri. S.D. Kaldate, Additional Public Prosecutor,
for respondents Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & SHRIHARI P DAVARE,JJ.
DATE: 6th AUGUST 2009
PER COURT :
1)The learned counsel Shri. P.K. Joshi
seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition as the
proceedings are pending before the Collector.
2)The learned APP Shri. Kaldate has
brought to our notice a communication dated
5-8-2009 of the Collector, Aurangabad addressed
2
to the Public Prosecutor. We have perused the
same.
3)Without adverting to the merits of the
mater we allow the counsel to withdraw the
petition for raising his grievances before the
appropriate forum.
. We expect the Collector to finally dispose of
the proceedings at the earliest.
4)The writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. Authenticated copy be given to the
counsel.
(SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)
rsl/ crwp.578.09
Deepak S/o Ramkrishna Bharuka
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H PATIL
SHRIHARI P DAVARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court