`Office Notes,`	`Office`
`Memoranda` `of` `appearances,` `orders or directi` `Registrar’s orders`	`Coram,` `Court’s` `ons and` `.`	`Court’s or Judge’s order`
		`Criminal Application No.2004 Of` `In` `Criminal Application No.2003 Of` `-----`	`2009` `2009`
		`Smt.R.R.` `Mane,` `Additional`	`Public`
		`Prosecutor, for applicant – State.` `Smt. Mutatkar holding for Smt` `Jadhav, for respondents 1 to 6.` `Mr. S.P. Brahme, for petitioner` `Revision Application No.148 of 200` `-----` `1)` `Heard.`	`. S.S.` `in Cr.` `9.`
		`2)` `Considering the contentions`	`raised`
		`in the application and after hear`	`ing the`
		`submissions advanced by the coun`	`sel, we`
		`are` `convinced` `that` `dela`	`y` `is`
		`satisfactorily explained.`
		`3)` `The` `delay` `is` `condoned`	`.` `The`
		`application is allowed to that` `Application stands disposed of.`	`extent.`
		`(SHRIHARI P DAVARE,J.)(NARESH H PA` `Dated: 4`^th`August 2009` `rsl/ crapln.2004.09`	`TIL,J.)`

State of Maharashtra v. Raju S/O. Bhagwat Suryawanshi and Ors.

Case brief