Writ petition filed against order of externment which had expired. Court declared the petition infructuous and disposed of it accordingly on the date of order.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
USJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 567 OF 2009
Abdul Razzak Mohamad Idris @ Abdul Razzak Mohamad Saeed @ Guru
.. Petitioner
v/s.
State (Samata Nagar Police Stn.) & Ors.
.. Respondents
Mr. I.A. Shaikh for petitioner. Smt. V. R. Bhosale, APP for respondent State.
CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & R.Y.GANOO, JJ.
Dated : 10th November, 2009
P.C. :
1. Heard Mr. Shaikh, learned Counsel for the petitioner. The order of
externment was passed against the petitioner from 9.8.2008 for a period of 2 years. However, the lower authority by her order dated
21.11.2008 allowed the appeal partly and the period of externment was reduced from 2 years to 1 year.
[R.Y.GANOO, J.]
[B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.]
Abdul Razzak Mohamad Idris
State (Samata Nagar Police Stn.)
B.H. MARLAPALLE
R.Y.GANOO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
