Criminal Writ Petition challenging the removal of the petitioner from the remission register due to refusal of factory work. Bench found no procedural error and rejected the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1651 OF 2009
Javed Nihal Ahmad Nihal Ansari
.. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, APP for State.
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & R.Y. GANOO, JJ.
November 09, 2009.
P.C.
2
his reply. On 7/1/2008 the impugned order was passed and the same has been approved by the learned District and Sessions Judge.
(R.Y. GANOO,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
Javed Nihal Ahmad Nihal Ansari
The State of Maharashtra
B.H. Marlapalle
R.Y. Ganoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
