The court rejected the writ petition regarding surplus workers absorbed by the Government. It held that absorbed workers have no right to claim a specific post and may choose not to join the service if they find the orders unacceptable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 418 OF 2009
1. Deelip s/o Nanji Wagh & 5 ors.] .. Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Maharashtra & 5 ors. ] .. Respondents
Mr. Vipin Kasle for the petitioners.
Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP, for the respondents No.1 to 6.
CORAM: S.B. MHASE &
D.B. BHOSALE, JJ.
DATED: 24TH FEBRUARY, 2009
P.C. :
1.Petitioners are surplus workers and they have
been absorbed by the Government. Petitioners have no
right to claim a particular absorption in service. If
the orders of absorption are not acceptable to the
petitioners, they are at liberty not to join the said
post. Petition rejected.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether surplus workers absorbed by the Government have a right to claim a particular post of absorption.
Deelip s/o Nanji Wagh & 5 ors.
The State of Maharashtra & 5 ors.
S.B. MHASE
D.B. BHOSALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court