The petitioner withdrew Writ Petition No.3183 of 2009. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AJN
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3183 OF 2009
Dwarkanath Arjun Kande
... Petitioner
Vs.
Tahsildar, Taluka Niphad & Ors. ... Respondents
Ms. Bharati V. Garud for the petitioner.
Mr. V.S. Gokhale, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 7TH AUGUST, 2009.
P.C.:-
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that she has instructions to withdraw the petition. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of as such.
[SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.]
[A.A. SAYED, J.]
Dwarkanath Arjun Kande
Tahsildar, Taluka Niphad & Ors.
Ranjana Desai
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
