Petitioner filed a writ petition. In court, counsel moved for withdrawal based on petitioner's instructions. The Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2689 OF 2007
Haribhau Z. Salunkhe
.. Petitioner.
vs.
The State of Maharashtra
& Ors. .. Respondent.
Ms. Deepali Patil for the petitioner.
Haribhau Z. Salunkhe, the petitioner is present in Court.
None for respondents.
CORAM : J.N. PATEL &
SMT. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE : 17TH JUNE, 2009.
P.C. :
Not on Board. Mentioned.
2
16.6.2009. The judgment and order is yet to be signed. Therefore, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has mentioned the matter and submits that she has instructions from the petitioner, who is present in the
court, to withdraw the petition. In the peculiar facts and circumstances we recall our judgment and order and permit the petitioner to withdraw
the petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(J.N. PATEL, J.)
(SMT. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
Haribhau Z. Salunkhe
The State of Maharashtra
J.N. PATEL
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
