Dismissed
Ceat Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/2636/1990
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petitioner seeks leave to withdraw Writ Petition No.2636 of 1990. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
No order as to costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
mpt
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
WRIT PETITION NO.2636 OF 1990
¶4
Ceat Ltd. .. Petitioner
¶5
versus
¶6
Union of India & ors. .. Respondents
¶7
Mr. H.C. Daruwala i/b Mulla & Mulla for the petitioner.
¶8
Mrs.S.V. Bharucha for the respondents.
¶9
CORAM : FI. REBELLO AND
¶10
D.G. KARNIK, JJ
¶11
DATED : 23rd July 2009.
¶12
P.C:-
¶13
- 1 . On instructions, learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Rule discharged. There shall be no order as to costs.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Ceat Ltd.
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
AI extract
F.I. REBELLO
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court