This writ petition was disposed of without interference because the matter was fixed before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Mumbai, to be heard expeditiously after a court order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2587 OF 2008
Dena Bank ... Petitioner
Vs.
M/s. L.Natarlal & Co. & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr.V.K.Tiwari i/b.
M.V.Kini & Co. for the petitioner.
Mr. G.T.Kukreja i/b. Mr. D.H.Shah for the respondents.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED: 13TH MARCH, 2009.
P.C.
1. It is brought to our notice that the matter is
fixed before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Mumbai on 16th
March, 2009. We direct the Tribunal to hear the matter
on that day and pecide the Application finally
expeditiously and, in any case, not later than six weeks
2
from that date.
2. In view of this order, this petition does not
call for any interference. Hence, the petition is
disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J.
Dena Bank
M/s. L.Natarlal & Co.
Swatanter Kumar
D.Y.Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court