Writ petition deemed infructuous as the underlying application was already decided and the petitioner had been informed, resulting in dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2357 OF 2009
Dattakala Education Society. Versus The State of Maharashtra and 2 others.
..Petitioner.
..Respondents.
Miss.M.Surve, Advocate i/b. Mr.P.J. Thorat, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.V.S. Masurkar, A.G.P., for the State.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ
DATED : 27TH APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
[BILAL NAZKI,J.]
2
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Dattakala Education Society
The State of Maharashtra
BILAL NAZKI
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
