Bharat Pukharaj Jain v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition was allowed to be withdrawn upon instructions from petitioner's counsel.
What did the court decide?
Petition withdrawn and allowed.
Writ petition was allowed to be withdrawn upon instructions from petitioner's counsel.
Petition withdrawn and allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.2259 OF 2009
------------------------------------:----------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders.
coram, appearances, Court’s orders :
or directions and Registrar’s :
orders. :
------------------------------------:-----------------------------------
Mr.Sagar Joshi for the petitioner.
Mr.Vinay Masurkar G.P. for the respondents.
CORAM: S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ.
DATED: 12TH MARCH, 2009.
P.C.:
. Learned counsel for the petitioner
states that he has instructions to withdraw
the petition. The petition is allowed to be
withdrawn.
(D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)
Petitioner
Respondents
S.B.MHASE
D.B.BHOSALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court