The Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a father disputing custody of his children. The petitioner's claim that his wife was also missing was rejected due to lack of evidence, and no notice was issued. The petition was dismissed on these grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6.wp.2200-09 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2200 OF 2009
Babu Singh. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent.
Mr.Santosh Singh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Dr.F.R. Shaikh, A.P.P., for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND
A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 14th SEPTEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
between the mother and the father of the children. Although the petitioner claimed that his wife is also missing alongwith his children, there is nothing on record to show the same. For these reasons, we don’t find any reason to issue notice in this matter. Writ Petition is dismissed.
[BILAL NAZKI,J.]
[A.R.JOSHI,J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a notice should be issued to the petitioner in a dispute regarding custody of children when his claim that his wife is missing is unsupported by evidence on record.
Babu Singh
State of Maharashtra
BILAL NAZKI
A.R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
