Petitioner challenged case registration regarding his daughter's death. Court noted Police registered case based on Section 306/498A IPC and advised aggrieved party to approach Sessions Judge. Writ petition dismissed.
Writ petition disposed of; petitioner advised to approach Sessions Judge for investigation grievances.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5.wp.1764-09 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1764 OF 2009
Shri Chandrakant Sampat Randive. ..Petitioner. Versus Ritesh Tukaram Bhandare and 4 others. ..Respondents.
Mr.S.K. Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 14th SEPTEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
IPC for the death of his daughter. Counter affidavit has been filed in which the Police have maintained that they have found prima facie evidence under Section 306 r/w. 498A of IPC and they have registered a case and investigation has been completed and chargesheet is filed. If the petitioner is aggrieved even today about the investigations, he can always approach the concerned
5.wp.1764-09 2
Sessions Judge and Sessions Judge is not powerless to look into the grievance of the petitioner. With these observations, Writ
Petition is disposed of.
[BILAL NAZKI,J.]
[A.R.JOSHI,J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner is entitled to register a case under Section 302 IPC given police found evidence under Section 306 IPC.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Chandrakant Sampat Randive
Ritesh Tukaram Bhandare
Bilal Nazki
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
