Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioners following an amicable settlement evidenced by a marked memorandum of understanding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.212/2009
Sanjay Bhimashankar Mangule & Anr . . PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
& Ors .. RESPONDENTS
Shri N.N.Chitlange,Adv.for petitioner. Shri S.K.Kadam,AGP for Respondent no.1 Shri P.M.Shah,Adv.for Respondents 2 to 9.
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS &
R.K.DESHPANDE,JJ.
DATE : 17/06/2009
ORAL ORDER :
The learned counsel for the petitioner has tendered before us a document purported to be memorandum of understanding evidencing amicable settlement of the dispute between the parties. The aforesaid document is taken on record and marked as “X” for the purpose of identification. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to this memorandum of understanding, the petitioners do not wish to
2
prosecute the petition any further and seeks to withdraw the same. Accordingly, Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to
costs.
[R.K.DESHPANDE] JUDGE
[P.V.HARDAS] JUDGE
umg/wp212-09
Sanjay Bhimashankar Mangule
The State of Maharashtra
P.V.HARDAS
R.K.DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
